Cornell International Law Journal
Article Title
Emasculating the Philosophy of International Criminal Justice in the Iraqi Special Tribunal
Keywords
International Law, Judiciary, Criminal Justice, article, Iraq, Jurisdiction, International offenses, Criminal jurisdiction
Abstract
In this article in the Symposium on Milosevic & Hussein on Trial, the author argues that the principle of international tribunality of jurisdiction is a form of globalization of international criminal justice that has the purpose of preventing the problems seen in the Iraqi Special Tribunal (IST) & the monopolization of international law by the United Nations Charter. Examination of historical, contemporary, & prospective approaches to the system of international law concerning the prosecution & punishment of individuals questions whether the laws of the IST reflect the basic foundations of international criminal justice. The principles of the Criminal Justice System are delineated & related to the historical background of earlier trials, international criminal responsibility, the application of the Principle of Internationality, & infringement of the rights of the accused. The legal & political implications of the Hussein trial are discussed in terms of the philosophy of justice in the distinctions of international criminal law, international criminal justice, & international criminal jurisdiction. J. Harwell
Recommended Citation
Malekian, Farhad
(2005)
"Emasculating the Philosophy of International Criminal Justice in the Iraqi Special Tribunal,"
Cornell International Law Journal: Vol. 38:
No.
3, Article 2.
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol38/iss3/2