Cornell International Law Journal
Article Title
Consumer Financial Protection and Human Rights
Keywords
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Consumer credit contracts
Abstract
This summer the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau proposed a rule that would restrict the use of mandatory arbitration clauses in consumer financial credit contracts. With the administration and Congress seemingly eager to pull back on consumer financial regulations, it is crucial to examine the rights at stake. Many financial institutions have agreed to protect and promote human rights, so pressure from consumers, human rights organizations, and consumer protection advocates may succeed even though Congress has declined to promulgate the CFPB’s proposed rule. This Article argues that the existing binding, mandatory arbitration system in consumer credit contracts is inconsistent with human rights principles, including property rights, rights to be free from discrimination, and due process rights. This Article then evaluates the CFPB’s rule from a human rights standpoint, and explores the CFPB’s role in mitigating human rights concerns triggered by arbitration clauses in consumer credit contracts.
Recommended Citation
Ondersma, Chrystin
(2017)
"Consumer Financial Protection and Human Rights,"
Cornell International Law Journal: Vol. 50:
No.
3, Article 4.
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol50/iss3/4