Digital media and software have broken copyright law. Although a consumer experiences the same work when reading a book printed on paper or copied onto an e-reader, the applications of copyright law to traditional and digital media usage have diverged dramatically because digital works are frequently copied in the course of their use. Copyright theorists have struggled with how to craft legal rules that would align rights in traditional and digital works, frequently proposing new exceptions for digital uses or interpretations of fair use. But there is a more elegant path forward, which has been too difficult to contemplate seriously because the law that needs to be changed is synonymous with copyright itself.
The reproduction right-the copy right-should be eliminated. Historically, the reproduction right functioned well to give copyright holders control over their work and as a reasonable tool for determining how much remuneration they were due. But now the reproduction right fails as a proxy for value in the digital realm by overcounting copies that have little relationship to the value created by authors.
This Essay makes the case for eliminating the reproduction right entirely and for augmenting other exclusive authors' rights in exchange. Although superficially radical, the elegant results of reform render the suggestion worth contemplating. Moreover, despite the political infeasibility of reforming copyright in the immediate future, understanding potential alternatives can prepare us to seize other opportunities for reform when they arise.
"Copyright without Copying,"
Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy: Vol. 27
, Article 5.
Available at: https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cjlpp/vol27/iss2/5