Publication Date
11-2021
Abstract
An employee was employed on an oral contract of employment since June 2016 by an employer engaged in providing casino services. He was never availed with a copy of his contract and was paid a salary below the prescribed minimum for workers protected by the Shop Workers Order.
During 2021, he raised a complaint relating to his NAPSA contributions and was subsequently summarily dismissed. He commenced an action before the Industrial Relations Division of the High Court seeking the following reliefs:
• Benefits for the years worked;
• Leave days;
• Unfair and wrongful dismissal; and
• Costs and any other benefits the Court may deem fit.
Recommended Citation
Chungu, Chanda
(2021)
"Albert Mupila v. Yu-Wei COMP/ IRCLK/222/2022,"
SAIPAR Case Review: Vol. 4:
Iss.
2, Article 11.
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/scr/vol4/iss2/11
