The correct procedure for commencing an action in the Industrial Relations Division of the High Court: Edward Chilufya Mwansa and 194 Others v. Konkola Copper Mines Plc SCZ Appeal No. 99/2015 and Concrete Pipes v. Kingsley Kaimba and Another SCZ Appeal No. 014/2015

Authors

Chanda Chungu, University of Zambia

Publication Date

4-2022

Abstract

In Edward Chilufya Mwansa and 194 Others v. Konkola Copper Mines Plc, the Supreme Court dealt with a scenario where several employees had been dismissed and sought to enter an out of court settlement with their employer, through the assistance of the Labour Office. This process lasted over three years

In Concrete Pipes v. Kingsley Kaimba and Another, the Supreme Court dealt with an appeal from a Ruling of the Industrial Relations Court dismissing a preliminary issue in relation to the need to exhaust internal administrative channels before commencing an action before the court.

Recommended Citation

Chungu, Chanda (2022) "The correct procedure for commencing an action in the Industrial Relations Division of the High Court: Edward Chilufya Mwansa and 194 Others v. Konkola Copper Mines Plc SCZ Appeal No. 99/2015 and Concrete Pipes v. Kingsley Kaimba and Another SCZ Appeal No. 014/2015," SAIPAR Case Review: Vol. 5: Iss. 1, Article 13.
Available at: https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/scr/vol5/iss1/13