Document Type



Featured as the Donald A. Giannella Memorial Lecture, 2008. Published in Villanova Law Review, vol. 53, no. 1 (2008).


Adherence to the “rule of law” entails a strong commitment to consistency - a belief that throughout a jurisdiction and across time judges should treat like cases alike. For over a century, the U.S. judiciary's pursuit of this aim has relied principally upon print law reports. With unsettling rapidity, digital technology has dislodged that system, in practical fact, if not yet in the way lawyers and judges talk and think about case law. This article explores gains one might hope for from a “judicial consistency” system liberated from the constraints of print, likely effects on concepts of precedent, as well as challenges and forces of resistance standing in the way of change.

Date of Authorship for this Version



neutral citation, precedent, appellate courts, stare decisis, official reports, digital technology, Westlaw, Lexis, West Publishing

Included in

Courts Commons