In Richard Musenyesa v. Indo Zambia Bank Limited, the Supreme Court dealt with an employee whose conditions of service were altered by their employer. The entitlement to gratuity at the end of the employment relationship was not mentioned in the new conditions of employment despite being in the previous conditions that regulated his employment.
The Supreme Court provided that where acquiescence is intended to be assumed from conduct, credible evidence will have to be led, showing that the employee was by clear notice given by the employer indeed aware of the variation, understood the implications and its full extent, before it can be said that they acquiesced or consented by conduct.
"Richard Musenyesa v. INDO Zambia Bank Limited Appeal No. 214/2016 (2020),"
SAIPAR Case Review: Vol. 3:
1, Article 12.
Available at: https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/scr/vol3/iss1/12