•  
  •  
 

Publication Date

5-2024

Abstract

This case underscores the critical need for the judiciary to assert its financial independence, ensuring that its budget and resources are not subject to undue influence or control by the executive. In this landmark ruling, the Constitutional Court missed an important opportunity to set a stronger precedent for the autonomy of the judiciary by not fully addressing the constitutional violations at hand relating to the financial independence of the judiciary. The Court’s decision, while acknowledging the issue of financial independence, failed to provide a decisive remedy to protect the judiciary from the continuing risk of executive interference. Recognizing the necessity of an independent and self-sustaining judiciary in legal rulings is essential as it strengthens the rule of law and promotes judicial independence and impartiality. This acknowledgment is important in safeguarding democratic governance and ensuring that the judiciary can carry out its functions without external pressures. Courts must lead by example in reinforcing the independence of the judiciary, not only through legal mechanisms but also through decisive action to guarantee its financial autonomy.

Download

Share

COinS