Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-2016
Keywords
Yvanova v New Century Mortgage Corp., Mortgage, Nonjudicial foreclosure
Disciplines
Banking and Finance Law
Abstract
Much of the discussion about the recent California Supreme Court case Yvanova v New Century Mortgage Corp. (2016) 62 C4th 919 has focused on the scope of the Court’s narrow holding, “a borrower who has suffered a nonjudicial foreclosure [in California] does not lack standing to sue for wrongful foreclosure based on an allegedly void assignment merely because he or she was in default on the loan and was not a party to the challenged assignment.” 62 C4th at 924.This is an important question, no doubt, but I want to spend a little time contemplating the types of sloppy behavior at issue in the case and what consequences should result from that behavior.
Recommended Citation
David J. Reiss, "Sloppy, Sloppy, Sloppy: the State of the Mortgage Market", 39 California Real Property Law Reporter (May 2016)
Comments
This article predates the author's affiliation with Cornell Law School.