Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-2005
Keywords
Patent law, Originality, Gene patents, Patent clause, Copyright clause, 1952 Patent Act, 35 USC 101, Trade-Mark Case
Disciplines
Intellectual Property Law
Abstract
Originality has always been a part of patent law. It bars patents that are obtained by copying from someone or from somewhere. Modern judicial interpretations of the patent act have ignored this second element of originality. But as originality is, at least arguably, a constitutional limit of the Patent and Copyright clause, the courts must interpret the patent act consistently to include originality. As a specific example, the paper focuses on patents claiming isolated and purified naturally-occurring gene sequences. The paper concludes that such patents are not original – they are instead just the result of copying – and thus they are invalid.
Recommended Citation
Liivak, Oskar, "The Forgotten Originality Requirement: A Constitutional Hurdle for Gene Patents" (2005). Cornell Law Faculty Publications. 600.
https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/600
Publication Citation
Oskar Liivak, "The Forgotten Originality Requirement: A Constitutional Hurdle for Gene Patents", 87 Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society (2005)
Comments
This article predates the author’s affiliation with Cornell Law School.